<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microphone Opinions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mychurchgig.com/2009/03/microphone-opinions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mychurchgig.com/2009/03/microphone-opinions/</link>
	<description>thoughts about church audio and other tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 00:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.mychurchgig.com/2009/03/microphone-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 00:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mychurchgig.com/?p=72#comment-310</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;... personally believe it’s the best Dynamic microphone out there.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I couldn&#039;t agree more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230; personally believe it’s the best Dynamic microphone out there.</p></blockquote>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stillwater</title>
		<link>http://www.mychurchgig.com/2009/03/microphone-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Stillwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 08:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mychurchgig.com/?p=72#comment-309</guid>
		<description>I have used the Opus 89 microphone for almost a year.  Since I sing a lot of standards I wanted a dynamic microphone that was closest to a condenser because of nuances.  So I wanted to upgrade from my Shure SM Beta58, which already did a great job. I was hesitant to buy this microphone because the description of this mic  was hailing for rock/pop.  I took a chance on this buy, because most of you searching for information on this mic will know that it&#039;s hard to test this microphone in your local music store since most music stores don&#039;t carry them.  It&#039;s this review I read that made me give it a chance,   The sound quality blew me away when I first tested in my home.  The presence at first was uncomfortable, since I was not used to a microphone that was more clearer and pristine than the Shure Beta58.  So it took a while to get used to a more sensitive microphone.  I also use it for rock and it&#039;s clearly superior  than your average SM58.  I have also accidently dropped this mic from 4 feet high and made no dent.  I am happy I an personally believe it&#039;s the best Dynamic microphone out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used the Opus 89 microphone for almost a year.  Since I sing a lot of standards I wanted a dynamic microphone that was closest to a condenser because of nuances.  So I wanted to upgrade from my Shure SM Beta58, which already did a great job. I was hesitant to buy this microphone because the description of this mic  was hailing for rock/pop.  I took a chance on this buy, because most of you searching for information on this mic will know that it&#8217;s hard to test this microphone in your local music store since most music stores don&#8217;t carry them.  It&#8217;s this review I read that made me give it a chance,   The sound quality blew me away when I first tested in my home.  The presence at first was uncomfortable, since I was not used to a microphone that was more clearer and pristine than the Shure Beta58.  So it took a while to get used to a more sensitive microphone.  I also use it for rock and it&#8217;s clearly superior  than your average SM58.  I have also accidently dropped this mic from 4 feet high and made no dent.  I am happy I an personally believe it&#8217;s the best Dynamic microphone out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Aldworth</title>
		<link>http://www.mychurchgig.com/2009/03/microphone-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Aldworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mychurchgig.com/?p=72#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Your reviews are  great, not just statistics and what hz-khz a mic handles.  I&#039;m the lead male vocalsist in a band called Evidence Based. I was looking through reviews of microphones to give myself an idea of what to buy.    ive owned i Beyerdynamic opus 89 for nearly a year and its great!  i have a voice comparable to Brian Blessed, (quite loud) and with other mics ive peaked the eq on the desk and they&#039;ve had to turn me down on certain songs...but not with the opus 89!  The band have been that impressed that we are considering buying more mics from the beyerdynamic range, such as TG-X 80 and OPUS 81.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your reviews are  great, not just statistics and what hz-khz a mic handles.  I&#8217;m the lead male vocalsist in a band called Evidence Based. I was looking through reviews of microphones to give myself an idea of what to buy.    ive owned i Beyerdynamic opus 89 for nearly a year and its great!  i have a voice comparable to Brian Blessed, (quite loud) and with other mics ive peaked the eq on the desk and they&#8217;ve had to turn me down on certain songs&#8230;but not with the opus 89!  The band have been that impressed that we are considering buying more mics from the beyerdynamic range, such as TG-X 80 and OPUS 81.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.mychurchgig.com/2009/03/microphone-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mychurchgig.com/?p=72#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the colorful metaphors, and the good fundamental A/B comparisons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the colorful metaphors, and the good fundamental A/B comparisons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grggr</title>
		<link>http://www.mychurchgig.com/2009/03/microphone-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>grggr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mychurchgig.com/?p=72#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Sam-
i love your blogs...i just wish i was smart or informed enough to understand half f it...
still...very enlightening!

-g</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam-<br />
i love your blogs&#8230;i just wish i was smart or informed enough to understand half f it&#8230;<br />
still&#8230;very enlightening!</p>
<p>-g</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
